When will you say that this blogsite and that website have miserably failed? What is your definition of a blog-failure? Should we conclude a blogsite failure because it generates two to three unique site visitors a day?
It must be from Terry Heath's blogsite (I like his literary criticism, by the way) that I first learned of this gloomy fact. Only 2 percent of the hundreds of millions of blogsites/websites can really be condsidered successful (or profitable). Google is indexing billions and billions of web pages every day. What is your chance of being noticed? What is my chance of being noticed? Hard questions.
Therea are those who blog for money, thus traffic is of paramount concern to them. Techcrunch.Com blog, they say, is earning $240,000. In February 2008, JohnChow.Com earned $30,000, most of which came from paid site reviews. (John Chow talks about websites, and website owners pay him at least $500 per review.)
There are those who started a personal blog site but don't care so much about traffic. They just put a personalname dot com website and published their resumes/biodata and credentials. They use their websites as their special digital identity. We should not consider this type of website "a failure"?
How about you? Is your website one of the elite 2 percent? What is the purpose of your website? To make money out of it? Or to claim your unique Internet identity? || Separate Word: Discover how ThinkHost can help you start a Wordpress-powered blogsite, or use its Free Website Maker. >read more details here>
98 % Of Millions of Blogsites Are Failure
